and it seems this site was generated with ai and then not reviewed before publishing. the layout of the content below the header doesn't really make sense and the "LI X FB" for LinkedIn, X, and Facebook is super unintuitive until you click one - and even after clicking one, i thought it was a collaboration between LinkedIn and Facebook tbh. then the animations are jarring and don't obey my reduced motion system settings, which isnt uncommon but i would expect it from Microsoft. finally, the "Explore all jobs" button at the bottom is just bizarrely designed and animated.

i mean the app is for vibe coding, what did you really expect?

Then it doesn't "rule them all" for anyone who needs a terminal, does it?

That’s an interesting way to say “code quality in the age of ai has gone out the window”

Are you suggesting that performing a specific task without unnecessary abstractions is indicative of poor quality?

and still necessary, regardless of who built it

yes, but that is not the problem here. the problem is that google search favors AI slop that makes this the preferred method of webdesign.

there is a huge difference between creating AI slop because i am lazy (which i think most people doing that are) and creating AI slop because otherwise google gives your website a bad rating.

now you and i may not care about google ratings, but many other people do, and the end result will be that all websites that want good ratings will end up being AI slop.

somehow we need to send google a message to stop that.

> somehow we need to send google a message to stop that.

...

The Google excuse doesn’t even hold water when you consider that the content of the website is so bad that it’s not even going to register for the relevant search terms. It’s just empty AI slop copy.

What are they even trying to rank for? It doesn’t make sense.