Ah I get it but you can't also just self censor for everyone left and right, and we have no right to get others to self censor. We will quickly run out of words to describe anything offensive. It's just outrage culture, I mean you can't restrict words just because things have happened to you or people around you. It's just an absurd thing to even begin to suggest.
"Yes, I know heroin is scary, but no, I am using it as a metaphor, and that couple has very little to do with me and you, so whats the problem? It's not like they sold you or me off." Is probably what I'll say.
It also brings to mind the OG of drug metaphors: "Religion is the opiate of the masses" nobody really chided him when he wrote that.
It's not just learning is it, why do people buy hand ground coffee when there quite literally isn't any difference? Or audiophile snake oil? As long as humans are still the consumers, some part of consumption will be emotional. Could be to support local artisans, could be gullibility, could be love, whatever.
Maybe one day artisanal code will be a thing lol. Hand written like calligraphy. Those with refined tastes will have their favorite code artisans. And the plebs can continue with mass produced industrial junk.
I have no evidence at all, but could it be that repeating the same thing over and over again in the context makes models latch on to it wrongly and gives them more confidence despite it being wrong? Kind of like a sunk cost fallacy…
Although I do acknowledge sometimes they too point out something I thought was quite right but turns out of be wrong…
A session is a screenplay between someone called User, and someone called Assistant who is a helpful and competent assistant to the user. Harnesses bring in tools to the screenplay.
A screenplay where a character has done a certain thing is one where they're more likely to do it again.
The problem with latex is definitely not types, not unless you're maintaining hundred line macros and defs. I think one problem is just that it's hard to represent 2d stuff in 1d. Like let's not even talk about equations, what about drawing tikz? It's like writing regex, I don't want to touch it again after I'm done.
Sometimes I rather just draw in inkscape and embed the PDF.
Also, taste. It's still kind of a wild west so you see people using the italics d for derivatives instead of the differential operator upright bold form. I guess because it's hard to type those out compared to "d". There's probably a lot more, but this is the most common. Some common whiteboard things that are just not obvious when typing in latex.
In any case it's good enough for what it is and with AI it will probably improve further, maybe I will just get it to fix all italics "d"s in the future so poor typesetting just gets fixed in post. That will probably enrage some people though :)
> It's still kind of a wild west so you see people using the italics d for derivatives instead of the differential operator upright bold form.
Upright and italic are both valid, but I don't think that I've ever seen a bold "d" used for an ordinary (scalar) derivative. I've seen it occasionally used for vector derivatives, but even that's rare.
> I guess because it's hard to type those out compared to "d".
This is intentional in many cases [0]. (But similar things like writing "sin" in italics is never okay and is just pure laziness.)
I added types because I wanted a better text editor for LaTeX; I was tired of using Overleaf, so I created Vitela (https://vitela.artificialfallibility.com/). Types provide me with useful information before compiling, similar to what TypeScript does with JavaScript.
I used to take notes in latex. I was fast enough to do it with snippets etc. Just skip over mistakes and fix them later. So for that application I think AI assistance would still be not very useful?
Also if you were to do assignments with latex it could be sketchy too if the class prohibits AI and you "fixed" your code with some AI help.
Antibiotics of all sorts, runoff, etc... There's no magic panacea. Thai and Vietnamese shrimp farms have been known to kill of swaths of mangroves. This you can find from a Google search.
On a more anecdotal basis, I've also heard that Norwegian salmon is fed quite a cocktail of antibiotics etc and some people for that reason prefer New Zealand or Scottish salmon. Again this part I have no evidence.
So anyway my point is that it's definitely not as easy as it seems unless I misunderstand what "land based" means, I just assume they're fish farms not in the open sea but somewhere in a lake or an artificially made pool.
Container escapes can however be quite easy... There are tons of known exploits. Containers are not secure in the first place. In any case even if you're using VMs or bare metal, it is all for moot if you have poor networking set up like in this case, because escaping is not the hard part. An attacker doesn't really need to escape if they can scan your whole network and call other endpoints etc. like in this case.
This is certainly true of docker-style container setups where the host kernel is shared directly with other tenants, but it seems to me like a bold claim to make of gvisor as used by these systems.
Both Anthropic and OpenAI have consumer facing products that depend on their ability to run code in a container without falling victim to container escapes - Claude and ChatGPT both use containers as part of regular chats.
reply